It’s striking how often these poems tend to bring the reader’s
gaze toward the ground: to weeds, puddles, flowers, pebbles, and, of course,
the birds’ nests themselves. While some of Wordsworth’s poems observe nature
through a narrower aperture (The
Waterfall and the Eglantine, The Oak
and the Broom, A Pastoral—both conspicuously personified and engaged in
“lessons” of some sort), we could say Wordsworth is a poet more concerned with
vistas and horizons. This made me wonder to what degree the Romantic poetic horizon
or scope of vision is connected to class. What “horizon” is available to Clare,
and, similarly, does Wordsworth’s affluence preclude certain types of
engagement with the natural world? How might we situate Clare’s poetics (as we
can determine it thus far) in terms of the critical material we’re engaging?
As Jason was, I was also interested in the lack of
punctuation in Clare’s poems. The sonnets and poems written in short stanzas
were much easier to read, and I wondered about the difference in communicative
intent between, for example, Crows in
Spring and The Robins Nest.
Although there are many sonnet-length nest poems, I thought that the
open-endedness of the longer poems might speak to an anxiety about not only
closing things in (as mentioned in the introduction) but also about breaking
some kind of covenant. The discoveries of Clare’s speakers are often very
private events: how much is he trying to conceal even as he reveals?
While Clare personifies and projects as Wordsworth does, we
almost get a sense of the poet shrinking in order to experience and report back
from unexceptional yet hardly quotidian engagements with a nature both
constructed and engaged much differently from Wordsworth’s. I found myself
interested in the bird that “dreamth wrong” in The Firetails Nest juxtaposed with the clown who “thinks the
strange bird guards a serpents nest” in The
Wrynecks Nest. In Clare’s poems, neither people nor birds have a monopoly
on “understanding” the world they belong to. As in The Nightingales Nest, the speakers, especially, seem to struggle
toward that which remains “hidden as a thought unborn.” Is “deep ecology”
behind this thought that Clare’s poems grope toward?
No comments:
Post a Comment